. .

Chapter Four:
Where Social Ethics is Instructed by
Native American Social Wisdom about Religion

by Theodore Walker, Jr.

[Return to Main Menu to select another interpretive theme.]
[Return to Title Page.]
[to Circle of Concerns Menu.]

religion as interpretive theme:

It is characteristic of Native American social wisdom concerning human peoples to be attentive to these interpretive themes: tribalism, nationalism, relations to other life/land, and religion.

Here, social ethical reflection is very much instructed by Native American reflections on religion.

Native Americans characteristically understand religion
in terms of collective and individual efforts to be or become more rightly related to the all-inclusive Great Spirit/Creator,
and
in terms of efforts to be or become more rightly related to other life, including especially Mother Earth,* the land and other created-creative-creaturely life,
and
in terms of efforts to be or become more rightly related to human peoples, nations, tribes, and individuals.

*[See a note about recent scholarly controversy concerning the authenticity of the Mother Earth concept among Native American peoples: here instructed by Ines Talamantez of the Mescalero Apache Nation and Jace Weaver of the Cherokee nation.]

Religious ceremonies, prayers, songs, dances, and other righteous habits of thought and deed are understood to be essential to this effort.

Religion is important for interpreting various circles of social ethical concern, circles ranging from the most general population of all peoples to increasingly specific peoples, nations, and tribes.

There are twelve circles of concern identified in this chapter.
You may visit them sequencially, moving from the most general to the more specific, by simply continuing to scroll down the page,
or,
you may jump to selected circles by selecting from the following Circle of Concerns Menu.


[Return to Title Page] :o: [to Main Menu] :o: [to Start of Chapter Four]

chapter 4 ----about Religion

Circle of Concerns Menu

Select a circle of concern (from sections 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12):
[ or continue scrolling forward ]


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


:o: [to Title Page] :o: [to Main Menu] :o: [to Circle of Concerns Menu]
:o: [to Start of Chapter 4]
(chapter 4, section 1)

Religion
among Human Peoples Generically:
Descriptions, Predictions, Visions & Prescriptions


Here, our concern embraces human peoples generically. This, our most general circle of concern, includes all past, present, future, actual and conceivably actual human peoples in all actually and possibly peopled spaces.
[See chapter 4, section 1, summary statements]

.

descriptions & evaluations:


Through most of the past and present generations of human exisence, religion has been, and continues to be normal, important, and fundamentally good.

(While not all particular religions and religious acts are normal, important or good; religion generally remains normal, important and fundamentally good. In this regard, religion, like tribalism, is somewhat like language. While particular uses of language are evil, the existence of language itself remains a fundamental good.)

According to Native American social wisdom
about religion(s) among human peoples generically,
relations to the Great Spirit/Creator,
relations to lesser spirits and created-creative-creaturely life of all kinds, and
relations between human peoples (including relations between human nations, tribes, clans, families, and individuals)
are all normally and rightfully religious matters.

The normative and proper range of religious concerns includes concern for maintaining or achieving right relations
with the all-inclusive circle of life, and
with the many lesser circles of Earthly and local life.

Where human peoples are normally and rightly religious, in important respects, their religions are indigenous, local, and tribal.

predictions:

According to Native American social wisdom
concerning all human peoples in all peopled spaces and times,
where human peoples are rightly religious,
righteous religions will contribute
to good and proper relations (reverance) with the all-inclusive life of the Great Spirit/Creator,
to good and proper relations (respect and reciprocity) with other-than-human life, and
to good and proper relations among human peoples.

Conversely,
where human peoples are not rightly religious,
they will not develop
good and proper relations (reverance) with the all-inclusive life of the Great Spirit/Creator, and
they will not develop
good and proper relations (respect and reciprocity) with other-than-human life, and
they will not develop
good and proper relations among themselves.

[George Tinker of the Osage nation describes "respect" and "reciprocity" as characteristic values of Native American religions in his essay, "For All My Relations: Justice, Peace, and the Integrity of Christmas Trees" in SOJOURNERS (January 1991).]

visions:

Characteristically, Native American visions of rightly religious peoples are visions of individuals, tribes, and nations making deliberate and successful efforts
to contribute to right relations to the Creator/Great Spirit, and
to contribute to right relations with other created-creative-creaturely lives and spirits, including human and other-than-human creatures and creations.

Native American visions of rightly religious peoples include visions of
being rightly related to the all-inclusive circle of life,
and
being rightly related to to the many lesser circles of Earthly and local life.

This includes
being rightly related to specific geographic spaces and places,
and
being rightly related to local creatures and local life of every kind.

[George Tinker of the Osage nation emphasizes Native American religious attention to specific places and spaces in his essay--"The Full Circle of Liberation: An American Indian Theology of Place" in SOJOURNERS (October 1992).]

For example,
Black Elk's famous visions are visions of a future "nation" walking in a sacred manner along a religiously prescribed path to more righteous relations to other created-creative-creaturely life.

[See BLACK ELK SPEAKS: BEING THE LIFE STORY OF A HOLY MAN OF THE OGLALA SIOUX AS TOLD THROUGH JOHN G. NEIHARDT (Flaming Rainbow) (Lincoln: Univeristy of Nebraska Press, 1988/1932) by John G. Neihardt.]

Black Elk's visions reveal two paths into the future:
One is the religiously prescribed path,
a path envisioned as contributing to shared well-being,
including contributing
to the well-being of future generations of humans and
to the well-being of other created-creative-creaturely life.
Black Elk calls this path the good "red road" (BES, p. 147).
According to Black Elk's visions, walking the red road will bring the nation "into the sacred hoop" thereby enabling "the sacred tree" to live and to "leaf and bloom and fill with singing birds" (BES, p. 274).

Alternatively,
the other path, which Black Elk calls the black road,
represents all departure from the religiously prescribed path.
This is the path of failure to contribute to the well-being of future life, including human and non-human life. Black Elk says "walking on the black road" will break "the nation's hoop" and "the flowering tree be withered" (BES, p. 147).

Black Elk's visions prescribe that human nations choose the good red road and walk in a sacred manner.

[See BLACK ELK SPEAKS: BEING THE LIFE STORY OF A HOLY MAN OF THE OGLALA SIOUX AS TOLD THROUGH JOHN G. NEIHARDT (Flaming Rainbow) (Lincoln: Univeristy of Nebraska Press, 1988/1932) by John G. Neihardt.]

prescriptions:

According to Native American social wisdom, all human peoples, nations, tribes and individuals in all peopled spaces and times should be rightly religious. All should choose the good "red road" and "walk in a sacred manner."

All humans, throughout their many circles of association, collectively and individually, should contribute to
right relations to the Creator,
and to
right relations to creation, including especially Mother Earth and all Her creaturely life,
and to
right relations between human peoples, nations, tribes, and individuals.
Righteous religions prescribe that human peoples, individuals, tribes, and nations should reverence the Creator/Great Spirit and respect and be reciprocially related to other life.

According to Native American social wisdom
about religion among human peoples generically,
all religions should be attentive to the sacredness of the all-inclusive circle of life, and to the sacredness of the many lesser circles, including local life and specific local spaces and places. Native American social wisdom prescribes religious ceremonies and prayers appropriate to local, global, and cosmic existence.

According to traditional tribal wisdom,
including especially Native American social wisdom,
religiously significant creatures and creations include: individuals, families, clans, bands, tribes, nations, and other life.

Here,
other life includes past, present, and future life, including especially the lives of the seventh generation yet to come; and
other life includes other human life and other-than-human life, including especially the life of the land (Mother Earth and all Her many creatures).

[Native American concern for the seventh generation yet to come is emphasized by Chief Oren Lyons of the Onondaga nation in "Oren Lyons The Faithkeeper with Bill Moyers," a Public Affairs Television interview of Chief Oren Lyons by Bill Moyers (Air Date: 3 July 1991, transcript by Journal Graphics, New York, 1991).]

[And Grace Thorpe (Sac and Fox) emphasizes concern for "seven generations to come" (p. 56) in "Our Homes Are Not Dumps: Creating Nuclear-Free Zones in DEFENDING MOTHER EARTH: NATIVE AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES ON ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis Books, 1996) edited by Jace Weaver (Cherokee).]

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


:o: [to Title Page] :o: [to Main Menu] :o: [to Circle of Concerns Menu]
:o: [to Start of Chapter 4]
(chapter 4, section 2)

Religion
among Contemporary Human Peoples Globally:
Descriptions, Predictions, Visions & Prescriptions


Here our concern embraces contemporary human peoples globally, that is, the circle of all peoples presently existing on this planet.
.

descriptions:

Given a distinction between "traditional tribal" and "modern non-tribal" peoples (see chapter 1, section 2), one may distinguish two main groups of contemporary religions:
traditional tribal religions and
modern non-tribal religions.

Traditional Native American religions are among the traditional tribal religions, and popular Christian religions are among the modern non-tribal religions.

Both groups of religions concern themselves with the spiritual and physical well-being and healing of individuals,
and
both groups of religions concern themselves with the spiritual and physical well-being and healing of social groups of various kinds.

However,
traditional tribal religions usually exhibit
greater concern for social groups (families, clans, bands, tribes, nations, and peoples) and their relations to the Creator/Great Spirit, and
less concern with individual believers and their individual souls.

When comparing tribal religions with popular Christianity,
Vine Deloria, Jr. of the Sioux nations says Indian tribal religions differ from Christianity in exhibiting "no great demand to have a "personal relationship" with the Great Spirit in the same manner as popular Christianity has emphasized personal relationships with God" (GODISRED, 2nd edition, p. 79);
and
in that tribal religions make "no demand for a personal relationship with a personal savior" (GODISRED, 2nd edition, p. 195).

[See GOD IS RED: A NATIVE VIEW OF RELIGION, SECOND EDITION (Golden, Colorado: North American Press, 1992) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]

While the social dimension is paramount, tribal religions are not without an individual dimension. Vine Deloria, Jr. of the Sioux nations says,"To be sure, Indian tribal religions have an individual dimension. The vision quest of many of the tribes is primarily an individual responsibility" (GODISRED, 2nd edition, p. 196).

[See GOD IS RED: A NATIVE VIEW OF RELIGION, SECOND EDITION (Golden, Colorado: North American Press, 1992) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]

While vision quests are individual quests,
these individual quests are important for their contributions to the group.

As we learn from the example of Black Elk's visions,
the great visions are visions given for the sake of peoples, tribes, and nations. Black Elk repeatedly described himself as one living under moral obligation to see that his "great vision" of the "Flaming Rainbow" contributed to the well-being of the nation (BES, pp. 234, 237, 249-250, 270).

[See BLACK ELK SPEAKS: BEING THE LIFE STORY OF A HOLY MAN OF THE OGLALA SIOUX AS TOLD THROUGH JOHN G. NEIHARDT (Flaming Rainbow) (Lincoln: Univeristy of Nebraska Press, 1988/1932) by John G. Neihardt.]

Black Elk saw himself under obligation to "help to bring my people back into the sacred hoop, that they might again walk the red road in a sacred manner pleasing to the Powers of the Universe that are One Power" (BES, p. 238). For Black Elk, to receive a vision, especially a great vision, is to receive a power (BES, p. 201) and a "duty to help the people walk the red road in a manner pleasing to the Powers" (BES, p. 206).

Thus, even in their more individualist aspects such as vision quests,
traditional tribal religions usually exhibit greater concern for the behavior and well-being of social groups (families, clans, bands, tribes, nations, and peoples).

Also,
in contrast to modern non-tribal religions,
traditional tribal religions usually grant greater significance to the life of future generations.

[For example, Black Elk has visions of "clouds of baby faces smiling at me, the faces of the people not yet born" in BLACK ELK SPEAKS: BEING THE LIFE STORY OF A HOLY MAN OF THE OGLALA SIOUX AS TOLD THROUGH JOHN G. NEIHARDT (Flaming Rainbow) (Lincoln: Univeristy of Nebraska Press, 1988/1932) by John G. Neihardt (p. 186-187).]

[Similarly, Chief Oren Lyons of the Onondaga Nation emphasizes concern for the seventh generation yet to come as a characteristic concern of Onondaga and other Native American religions in "Oren Lyons The Faithkeeper with Bill Moyers," a Public Affairs Television interview of Chief Oren Lyons by Bill Moyers (Air Date: 3 July 1991, transcript #BMSP-16 by Journal Graphics, New York, 1991).]

And traditional tribal religions usually grant very much greater significance to other creatures and creations, including other animals, birds, plants, land, Mother Earth, Sun, Moon, and the cosmos.

For much traditional tribal thinking,
and especially for traditional Native American social wisdom,
religion is about individual, tribal, national, and international quests for right relations to other life,
including the all-inclusive life of the Creator/Great Spirit,
and
including the many lesser circles of created-creative-creaturely existence.

Where for modern philosophies, religions, and laws, relative to human life, all other Earthly created-creative-creaturely life has only subordinate and instrumental value;
by contrast,
for traditional and rightly tribal philosophies, religions, and laws such as those of many Native American peoples,
other created-creative-creaturely life has intrinsic and religiously significant value, and other created-creative-creaturely life has moral and legal standing.

Unlike modern Christian religion(s),
Native American religions do not suppose human life to have qualitatively different and greater intrinsic value than other created-creative-creaturely life.

And
unlike modern Christian religion(s),
Native American religions do not suppose humans are the only Earthly creatures created in the image of the Creator.


Through most of the many generations of human existence,
most human peoples have been tribal peoples, and
most human religions have been tribal religions.
Normally, traditional tribal religions have been indigenous to particular lands and particular peoples in particular places, and related to particular and local life of various kinds.

In contrast to traditional tribal religions,
believers in recently emergent modern non-tribal religions often claim:
  1. their religion is a "universal" or "world" religion,
    a religion fully and unsurpassibly adequate and appropriate to all peoples in all times and all places; and,
  2. their religion is the "only true religion,"
    all other religions being inadequate, mistaken, or morally and religiously wrong.

Accordingly, believers in such modern non-tribal religions have frequently believed themselves under obligation to obliterate all other religions, especially tribal religions, by conquering, evangelizing and converting all humanity to their one true religion.

According to Native American descriptions,
the last 500+ years of human history has been a history of 500+ years of modern religious assault upon traditional tribal religions, and 500+ years of resistance by traditional tribal peoples.

And resistance continues.

[See "The Sweetgrass Meaning of Solidarity: 500 Years of Resistance" in SOJOURNERS (Vol. 20, No. 1, January 1991) by Robert Allen Warrior.]

[See THE STATE OF NATIVE AMERICA: GENOCIDE, COLONIZATION, AND RESISTANCE (Boston: South End Press, Race and Resistance Series, 1992), edited by M. Annette Jaimes.]

[See DEFENDING MOTHER EARTH: NATIVE AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES ON ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE (Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 1996), edited by Jace Weaver of the Cherokee nation, foreword by Russell Means of the Oglala band of the Lakota Sioux nation. Here Russell Means says, "... we're still resisting" (p. xi).]

evaluation:

In regard to concern for the well-being of social groups
(including familes, clans, bands, tribes, nations, and peoples),
in regard to concern for the well-being of future generations
(including the seventh generation yet to come),
in regard to the more particular and local-location-specific aspects of being religious, and especially
in regard to concern for the well-being of other creatures and creations (including plants, non-human animals, the land and Mother Earth);
traditional tribal religions are more adequate than modern non-tribal religions.

example:

Robert Allen Warrior of the Osage Nation challenges Christianity and Christian liberation theologies to correct abuses inherent in the Exodus-Joshua traditions
by putting the Canaanites "at the center of Christian theological reflection" and
by giving attention to "the last remaining ignored voice in the text"--"the land itself" (p. 264)

[See "Canaanites, Cowboys, and Indians: Deliverance, Conquest, and Liberation Theology Today" in CHRISTIANITY AND CRISIS (11 September 1989) by Robert Allen Warrior.]

Similarly,
where Christian religion (see Matthew 25) teaches us
service to the needs of human neighbors counts as service to God;
Native American religions teach us
service to the needs of human neighbors counts as service to the Creator, and
service to the needs of other created-creative-creaturely life also counts as service to the Creator.

(Here, other created-creative-creaturely life includes future human life, including especially the seventh generation yet to come, and other-than-human life, including especially the land, our planetary Mother Earth, and Her many earthly creatures.)

Both teachings are true;
however,
the Native American teaching is more adequate.

.

The modern religious assault upon traditional tribal religions is unfortunate.
The continuing resistance of traditional tribal peoples is good.

[See GOD IS RED: A NATIVE VIEW OF RELIGION, SECOND EDITION (Golden, Colorado: North American Press, 1992) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]

predictions:

According to Native American social wisdom
about religion among contemporary human peoples globally,
continuing with past (500+ years) and present modern religious habits and behaviors will yield continuing and increasingly improper relations to other life.
Being wrongly related to other creaturely life will contribute to being wrongly related to human creaturely life, and it will contribute to being wrongly related to the Creator.

According to many Native American religious prophecies: contemporary human peoples are at a crossroads. Human peoples across the world must repent of modern relations to other life and take up efforts to contribute to the well-being and prosperity of other life. If contemporary human peoples fail to repent of modern relations to other life, then we will bring increasing disasters upon future human and other-than-human life. To be sure, human life cannot long survive the continually increasing destruction of other creaturely life.

This is the prophectic meaning of the recent birth of a white buffalo calf. Arvol Looking Horse, Keeper of the Original Lakota Sacred Pipe says, "The birth of the White Buffalo Calf lets us know we are at a crossroads - either return to balance or face global disaster."


[See a web page entitled "Arvol Looking Horse" on the world wide web
at http://www.fdl.cc.mn.us/~isk/arvol.html
or
see a December 1995 web-down-loaded-local copy of "Arvol Looking Horse".]

.
.

visions of an alternative more favorable future:

Many Native Americans envision the possibility of a more favorable alternative to continuing with past and presently inadequate modern religions. They envision a future where human peoples globally are rightly religious.

Among the most famous of such visions are the great visions of Black Elk, a holy man of the Oglala band of the Lakota Sioux Nation.
According to Black Elk, the holy tree of life includes "every living thing with roots or legs or wings," and human peoples, nations, tribes, and individuals are called to help "make it blossom" (BES, p. 28). Black Elk's visions are visions of rightly religious nations helping to make the holy tree of life, including every living thing, blossom. Helping to make the tree of life blossom is a religious obligation laid upon all contemporary peoples, nations, tribes, bands, clans, families, and individuals by Black Elk's sharing his great visions with the world, and by the visions of other Native American holy men and women.

Black Elk's visions are rooted in a traditional religious wisdom given long ago to the Dakota-Lakota-Nakota Sioux Nations by "a sacred woman" (BES, p. 3) known to many as the "Buffalo Calf Woman" or the "White Buffalo Calf Woman."

[See BLACK ELK SPEAKS: BEING THE LIFE STORY OF A HOLY MAN OF THE OGLALA SIOUX AS TOLD THROUGH JOHN G. NEIHARDT (Flaming Rainbow) (Lincoln: Univeristy of Nebraska Press, 1988/1932) by John G. Neihardt.]

Vine Deloria, Jr. of the Sioux nation forsees "the expansion of the Indian religious traditions into non-Indian society" because "within the tribal religions is a powerful spiritual energy that cannot be confined to a small group in the modern world" (CUSTER, p. xi). And Deloria says,
"It would be hazardous to predict where this movement is headed, but if it influences people to deal more kindly with the earth and the various life forms on it, then there should be few complaints about its impact on people's lives and practices" (CUSTER, p. xi).

[See CUSTER DIED FOR YOUR SINS: AN INDIAN MANIFESTO (Norman Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 1989/1969) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]

prescriptions:

According to Native American social wisdom
about contemporary human peoples globally,
what humanity needs now is more righteous religions, and more righteous religions are rightly tribal religions.

Contemporary human peoples globally should seek more rightly tribal religions.


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

:o: [to Title Page] :o: [to Main Menu] :o: [to Circle of Concerns Menu]
:o: [to Start of Chapter 4]
(chapter 4, section 3)

More Righteous Religion
for Traditional Tribal & Modern Non-Tribal Peoples:
More Specific Prescriptions and Visions

Here our concern is with more specific meanings of prescribing and envisioning more righteous religion
for contemporary traditional tribal peoples, and
for contemporary modern non-tribal peoples.


prescriptions:

Prescribing more righteous religions for contemporary traditional tribal peoples means prescribing continuing and increasing resistance to modern anti-tribal influences, and prescribing contributions to a global resurgence of righteous tribal values and righteous tribal religions.

The need for a global resurgence of righteous tribal religions means tribal peoples should teach tribal wisdom to modern non-tribal, anti-tribal, and wrongly tribal peoples.

Accordingly, Chief Oren Lyons, Faithkeeper of the Onondaga Nation (one of the six nations of the Haudenausaunee confederation of nations, a confederation called Iroquois by the French and Six Nations by the English) and Director of Native American Studies at the State University of New York at Buffalo "has devoted his life," says Bill Moyers, "to preserving the experiences and wisdom of his people and interpreting them to the dominant American culture" (Lyons, p. 2).


[See "Oren Lyons The Faithkeeper with Bill Moyers," a Public Affairs Television interview of Chief Oren Lyons by Bill Moyers (Air Date: 3 July 1991, transcript #BMSP-16 by Journal Graphics, New York, 1991).]

Similarly, Vine Deloria, Jr. of the Sioux nations seeks to teach traditional tribal wisdom to modern non-tribal peoples.

[See GOD IS RED: A NATIVE VIEW OF RELIGION, SECOND EDITION (Golden, Colorado: North American Press, 1992) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]
[See THE METAPHYSICS OF MODERN EXISTENCE (New York: Harper & Row, 1979) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]

Also, Ed McGaa/Eagle Man of the Sioux nations teaches traditional Sioux spirituality to help contemporary modern peoples heal improper relations to the Earth and to other life.


[See MOTHER EARTH SPIRITUALITY: NATIVE AMERICAN PATHS TO HEALING OURSELVES AND OUR WORLD (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1990) by Ed McGaa/Eagle Man.]

Prescribing more righteous religions for contemporary modern non-tribal peoples means prescribing that modern non-tribal peoples seek more adequate religions,
religions where collective-social relations are as important as individual souls,
where the religious significance of other created-creative-creaturely life is fully appreciated, and
where both the universal and the specific-local aspects of religion are more fully appreciated.
Vine Deloria, Jr. of the Sioux nations prescribes that religions should be indigenous to particular peoples and particular lands. Deloria writes "religion must relate to land" and "It must not be separated from a particular piece of land and a particular community ..." (GOD IS RED, 2nd edition, p. 202).

[See GOD IS RED: A NATIVE VIEW OF RELIGION, SECOND EDITION (Golden, Colorado: North American Press, 1992) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]

Prescribing more righteous religions for both traditional tribal and modern non-tribal contemporary peoples means prescribing a revival of rightly tribal traditional religions and a significant retribalization-indigenation-localization of modern non-tribal religions.
Traditional tribal peoples should evangelize to modern non-tribal peoples,
and
modern non-tribal-anti-tribal and wrongly tribal peoples should seek religious instruction from indigenous rightly tribal peoples.

Rightly tribal values and rightly tribal religions are very much concerned with maintaining or achieving righteous relations to other life (see chapter three: about Relations to Other Life/Land).

To this end, Vine Deloria, Jr. of the Sioux nations describes and prescribes a revival of traditional tribal religious ceremonies "performed on behalf of the earth, all humans, and the other forms of life" (GODISRED2nd, p. 3).
Deloria says:
"In traveling around the country I now see revivals of ancient ceremonies in many tribes as if the people had been warned of the catastrophes that await us. It is time for the people to gather and perform their old ceremonies and make a final effort to renew the earth and its peoples--hoofed, winged, and others."
(GODISRED2nd, p. 3)

In addition to prescribing a revival of tribal religious ceremonies for traditional tribal peoples, Deloria also prescribes that traditional tribal peoples teach modern non-tribal peoples about righteous relations to other life/land.

[See GOD IS RED: A NATIVE VIEW OF RELIGION, SECOND EDITION (Golden, Colorado: North American Press, 1992) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]
.
[Also, see THE METAPHYSICS OF MODERN EXISTENCE (New York: Harper & Row, 1979) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]

visions / alternative more favorable futures:

Native Americans envision an alternative to continuing with modernity. They envision an alternative and more favorable future where a resurgence of rightly tribal religions contribute to more adequate religious visions globally. In this alternative vision of the future, rightly tribal peoples teach rightly tribal religions to modern non-tribal, anti-tribal and wrongly tribal peoples, thereby helping them surrender non-tribal-anti-tribal and wrongly tribal religions in favor of more righteous tribal religions. This is a vision of a genuinely post modern world where righteous tribal values and religions are embraced in creative new ways.

sign of an alternative future:

Moreover, Native Americans see signs of coming change in the present. For example, Sioux and other Native American peoples see the recent (20 August 1994) birth of a white buffalo calf as a sign of coming change.

.
[See a web page entitled "Arvol Looking Horse" originally located at http://www.fdl.cc.mn.us/~isk/arvol.html
or
see a December 1995 web-downloaded-local-copy of "Arvol Looking Horse".
According to this web document, Arvol Looking Horse (19th Generation Keeper of the Sacred White Buffalo Calf Pipe for the Lakota Sioux Nation) sees the recent birth of a white buffalo calf as a sign of humanity now at a critical crossroads. Here Arvol Looking Horse is quoted as saying: "The birth of the White Buffalo Calf lets us know we are at a crossroads - either return to balance or face global disaster. It is our duty to return back to sacred places and pray for world peace - if we do not do this our children will suffer." Accordingly, Arvol Looking Horse called for a world-wide prayer ceremony on 21 June 1996.]
.
[See a December 1995 web-down-loaded-local-copy of "Miracle: White Buffalo of Prophecies Born in Wisconsin".]
.
[Also, see manually copied extended quotes from a recent newspaper story about the white buffalo calf: "Signs of a New Age: White Buffalo Calf Prompts Spiritual Awe".]


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


:o: [to Title Page] :o: [to Main Menu] :o: [to Circle of Concerns Menu]
:o: [to Start of Chapter 4]
(chapter 4, section 4)

Religion
among Contemporary Human Peoples
in the Lands of the Peoples of the Eagle & the Condor
Descriptions, Predictions, Visions & Prescriptions


Here, our circle of concern embraces contemporary peoples in the land of the people of the Eagle and in the land of the people of the Condor, lands recently called North America and South America, or the Americas (including lands and islands recently called Central America, West Indies, and the Caribbean).

descriptions:

As with contemporary religions globally, in the lands of the peoples of the Eagle and Condor, lands which are recently called North and South America, there are traditional tribal religions and modern non-tribal religions.
Here,
the traditional tribal religions are mainly the religions of Native American peoples, and
the modern non-tribal religions are mainly the religions of hybrid or hyphenated-American peoples--European-American, Hispanic-American, African-American, Asian-American, etc.

:o:o:o:o:
:o:o:o:o:

[terminology: "people of the Eagle" and "people of the Condor"]

[terminology: "hybrid," "hyphenated-American," and "Native American"]

[terminology: "Wasichus"]


:o:o:o:o:
:o:o:o:o:

Presently, Native American peoples are continuing "500 years of indigenous resistance" to the detribalizing forces of modernity.


["500 years of indigenous resistance" comes from "The Sweetgrass Meaning of Solidarity: 500 Years of Resistance" in SOJOURNERS (Vol. 20, No. 1, January 1991) by Robert Allen Warrior.]

Among hyphenated-American peoples, modernity continues.

evaluation:

According to Native American values,
continuing indigenous resistance is good; modernity is not.

....

[See descriptions, predictions, visions, & prescriptions
concerning tribal existence and tribal religions
among Native American peoples
instructed by Robert Allen Warrior's "The Sweetgrass Meaning of Solidarity: 500 Years of Resistance" in SOJOURNERS (Vol. 20, No. 1, January 1991).]

.

[See descriptions, predictions, visions, & prescriptions
concerning modern existence and modern religions
among hyphenated-American peoples
instructed by Vine Deloria, Jr. and Robert Allen Warrior.]

[Return to start of this section (section 4).]

.

Columbus & Coyote

In "Columbus and Coyote: A Comparison of Culture Heroes in Paradox"
in APUNTES (year 12, No. 2, Summer, 1992),
George Tinker of the Osage Nation identifies
"gifts" modern peoples have received from Native American peoples, and
"woes"/"oppressions" suffered by Native American peoples at the hands of modern hyphenated-American peoples.

Native American gifts identified by Tinker include the following:


Native American woes identified by Tinker include the following:

After listing gifts and woes, George Tinker returns to the gift of Native American spirituality.

Tinker identifies a Native American culture hero, "Coyote," as the "greatest gift," and,
he argues his case by contrasting Coyote with the famous European culture hero --Christopher Columbus (C&C, p. 80).

Tinker says Columbus "was a slave trader, a murderer who perpetrated acts of genocide in North America, a man driven by avarice and greed ... he enslaved Indian people for profit and shipped five hundred back to Spain for sale in the slave market of Serville ..." (C&C, p. 80)

In contrast to Columbus,
Tinker finds that the comical Coyote "is a healthier hero than Columbus" because "Coyote as a culture hero teaches us humility" (C&C, p. 81).

Rather than celebrating Columbus,
Tinker prescribes adopting an alternative more righteous culture hero, Coyote.

In contrast to Columbus,
Coyote as culture hero contributes to creating "a world that no longer depends upon exploiting many so a few can live well in North America" (C&C, p. 88).

Rather than celebrating Columbus,
hyphenated-American peoples, and other modern peoples, should accept the Native American gift of a more righteous cultural hero, Coyote.

[See "Columbus and Coyote: A Comparison of Culture Heroes in Paradox" by George E. Tinker in APUNTES, Year 12, No. 2, Summer, 1992.]

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


:o: [to Title Page] :o: [to Main Menu] :o: [to Circle of Concerns Menu]
:o: [to Start of Chapter 4]
(chapter 4, section 5)

Religion
among Contemporary Human Peoples
in the Land of the People of the Eagle, also called Great Turtle Island, also called North America:
Geography, Descriptions & Value Judgments

Here, our circle of concern embraces contemporary peoples in the land of the People of the Eagle, a land long known as the Great Turtle Island, a land which is recently called North America.

geography and descriptions:

The land of the people of the Eagle is named "Turtle Island" or "the Great Turtle Island." "Turtle Island" is the name used by ancient Lenni Lenape people. According to the WALLAM OLUM, in remote prehistoric times, the ancestors of the Lenni Lenape people, a people also called Delaware in modern times, migrated from west to east, crossing on a frozen bridge (near the Bering Strait), from a western continental land mass identified as the land of the Serpent or Dragon to an eastern contintental land mass named "Turtle Island."

[See THE RED RECORD: THE WALLAM OLUM: OLDEST NATIVE NORTH AMERICAN HISTORY (Garden City Park, New York: Avery Publishing Group, 1989) translated and annotated by David McCutchen.]

The WALLAM OLUM reports that after many years of wandering across the continent, the ancestors of the Lenni Lenape/Delaware encountered a people who were already at home on the Turtle Island, a people who are now called Iroquois. The migrating ancestors of the Lenni Lenape/Delaware made peace and became friends and allies with the ancestors of the Iroquois. (WALLAM OLUM, p. 41)

Chief Oren Lyons, of the Wolf clan, borrowed into the Turtle clan, Faithkeeper of the Onondaga Nation, one of the six nations of the Haudenausaunee confederation of nations (a confederation called Iroquois by the French and Six Nations by the English), teaches us the Haudenausaunee/Iroquois name for the continent is "the Great Turtle Island" (Lyons, p. 2).

[See "Oren Lyons The Faithkeeper with Bill Moyers," a Public Affairs Television interview of Chief Oren Lyons by Bill Moyers (Air Date: 3 July 1991, transcript #BMSP-16 by Journal Graphics, New York, 1991).]

In recent-modern times, modern hybrid and hyphenated-American peoples have come to call the Great Turtle Island by the name "North America."

descriptions & evaluations:

On the Great Turtle Island,
as in the land of the people of the Condor,
Native American peoples are many tribes and many nations.

Hyphenated-American peoples on the Great Turtle Island are not tribes, and only three nations--Canada, U.S.A., and Mexico.

The land and water spaces claimed by Native American tribes and nations overlap and conflict with the claims of the three hyphenated-American nations.

According to Native American judgments,
by right of long generations of prior occupancy, and by right of original title and hundreds of treaties, the claims of Native American tribes and nations hold legal and moral priority.
The Great Turtle Island, like the land of the people of the Condor, is traditionally, legally, and rightly the sovereign homeland of Native American tribes and nations. Hyphenated-American peoples are mainly foreign invaders, hybrid peoples, and illegal alien peoples.

Native American religions are indigenous to specific lands, waters, places, and locations on the Great Turtle Island.

The modern "world religions" of hyphenated-American peoples are not indigenous to the Great Turtle Island.
These religions exhibit little appreciation for specific local spaces and sacred sites.
The religious ceremonies of hyphenated-American peoples are not related to specific local lands and waters or to other than human local life.
The religions of hyhenated-American peoples have no subtantial long-standing rootage to specific lands and places on the Great Turtle Island.

Too be sure,
by Native American standards,
modern world religions (including especially modern Christian religions) are usually:
  • insufficiently attentive to space-place-location,
  • insufficiently concerned for the well-being of future life,
  • insufficiently attentive to the value of other-than-human creaturely life, and
  • insufficiently reverent toward land and Mother Earth.
These are very serious points of inadequacy.

.

[See GOD IS RED (New York: Grosset & Dunlap, 1973) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]
[See GOD IS RED: A NATIVE VIEW OF RELIGION, SECOND EDITION (Golden, Colorado: North American Press, 1992) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]
.
[See MOTHER EARTH SPIRITUALITY: NATIVE AMERICAN PATHS TO HEALING OURSELVES AND OUR WORLD (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1990) by Ed McGaa/Eagle Man.]
.
[See "Oren Lyons The Faithkeeper with Bill Moyers," a Public Affairs Television interview of Chief Oren Lyons by Bill Moyers (Air Date: 3 July 1991, transcript #BMSP-16 by Journal Graphics, New York, 1991)]
.
[See "Seeing Red: American Indian Women Speaking about Their Religious and Political Perspectives" by Ines Talamantez in IN OUR OWN VOICES: FOUR CENTURIES OF AMERICAN WOMEN'S RELIGIOUS WRITING (HarperSanFrancisco, 1995), edited by Rosemary Radford Ruether and Rosemary Skinner Keller.]
.
[See "'For All My Relations:' Justice, Peace, and the Integrity of Christmas Trees" in SOJOURNERS (Vol. 20, No. 1, January 1991) by George Tinker.]
.
[See "The Full Circle of Liberation: An American Indian Theology of Place" in SOJOURNERS (Vol. 21, No. 8, October 1992) by George Tinker.]
.
[See "Canaanites, Cowboys, and Indians: Deliverance, Conquest, and Liberation Theology Today" in CHRISTIANITY AND CRISIS (11 September 1989) by Robert Allen Warrior.]

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


:o: [to Title Page] :o: [to Main Menu] :o: [to Circle of Concerns Menu]
:o: [to Start of Chapter 4]
(chapter 4, section 6)

Religion
among Contemporary Human Peoples
North of the Rio Grande River in the Land of the People of the Eagle, also called Great Turtle Island, also called North America: Geography, Descriptions, Predictions, Visions & Prescriptions

Here, our circle of concern embraces contemporary human peoples north of the river called "Rio Grande" (also called "Rio Bravo"), which flows through the land of the People of the Eagle, a land which is named Great Turtle Island, and which is recently called North America.

[][][][]


For descriptions, predictions, visions & prescriptions,
all permeated by values and value judgments;
see a social ethical analysis of Chief Oren Lyons's 1992 address to the UN and
see a web-downloaded-local copy of Chief Oren Lyons's 1992 address to the UN.

[Return to Main Menu.]
.
[][][][]



geography:

On the Great Turtle Island,
recently called North America,
which is the Land of the People of the Eagle,
there is a great river.

Recently,
this great river has come to be called "Rio Grande" by English speaking hyphenated-American peoples on its northern side and "Rio Bravo" by Spanish speaking hyphenated-American peoples on its southern side.

description:

North of this great river,
Native American peoples are many tribes and many nations
and
hyphenated-American peoples are not tribes and only two nations: Canada and the United States of America.

The land and water spaces claimed by Native American tribes and nations overlap and conflict with the claims of the two hyphenated-American nations.

value judgment:

According to Native American judgments,
by right of original title and long generations of prior occupancy, and by right of hundreds of treaties, the claims of Native American tribes and nations hold legal and moral priority.
These lands and water ways are traditionally, legally, and rightly the sovereign homeland of indigenous-aboriginal Native American tribes and nations.

about religions:


Traditional tribal Native North American religions are indigenous to specific lands, waters, places, and locations on the Great Turtle Island.

The modern non-tribal "world religions" of hyphenated-American peoples are not indigenous to the Great Turtle Island.
These religions exhibit inadequate appreciation for specific local spaces and sacred sites on Great Turtle Island.
They are the religions of hybrid peoples with no subtantial long-standing rootage to specific lands and places on the Great Turtle Island.

Too be sure,
by Native American standards,
it is generally true that modern world religions,
including especially modern Christian religions, are:
  • insufficiently attentive to space-place-location,
  • insufficiently concerned for the well-being of future life,
  • insufficiently attentive to the value of other-than-human creaturely life, and
  • insufficiently reverent toward land and Mother Earth.

These are very serious points of inadequacy.

.

[See GOD IS RED (New York: Grosset & Dunlap, 1973) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]
[See GOD IS RED: A NATIVE VIEW OF RELIGION, SECOND EDITION (Golden, Colorado: North American Press, 1992) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]
.
[See MOTHER EARTH SPIRITUALITY: NATIVE AMERICAN PATHS TO HEALING OURSELVES AND OUR WORLD (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1990) by Ed McGaa/Eagle Man.]
.
[See "Oren Lyons The Faithkeeper with Bill Moyers," a Public Affairs Television interview of Chief Oren Lyons by Bill Moyers (Air Date: 3 July 1991, transcript #BMSP-16 by Journal Graphics, New York, 1991)]
.
[See "Seeing Red: American Indian Women Speaking about Their Religious and Political Perspectives" by Ines Talamantez in IN OUR OWN VOICES: FOUR CENTURIES OF AMERICAN WOMEN'S RELIGIOUS WRITING (HarperSanFrancisco, 1995), edited by Rosemary Radford Ruether and Rosemary Skinner Keller.]
.
[See "'For All My Relations:' Justice, Peace, and the Integrity of Christmas Trees" in SOJOURNERS (Vol. 20, No. 1, January 1991) by George Tinker.]
.
[See "The Full Circle of Liberation: An American Indian Theology of Place" in SOJOURNERS (Vol. 21, No. 8, October 1992) by George Tinker.]
.
[See "Canaanites, Cowboys, and Indians: Deliverance, Conquest, and Liberation Theology Today" in CHRISTIANITY AND CRISIS (11 September 1989) by Robert Allen Warrior.]

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


:o: [to Title Page] :o: [to Main Menu] :o: [to Circle of Concerns Menu]
:o: [to Start of Chapter 4] :o:
(chapter 4, section 7)

Religion
among Contemporary Native American Peoples
in Native American and U.S. Claimed Territories:
Descriptions, Predictions, Visions & Prescriptions


Here, our circle of concern embraces contemporary Native American peoples in territories north of the Rio Grande River where Native American claims to the land overlap and conflict with U.S. claims.

[][][][]


For descriptions, predictions, visions & prescriptions,
all permeated by values and value judgments;
see a social ethical analysis of BLACK ELK SPEAKS: BEING THE LIFE STORY OF A HOLY MAN OF THE OGLALA SIOUX AS TOLD THROUGH JOHN G. NEIHARDT (Flaming Rainbow) (Lincoln: Univeristy of Nebraska Press, 1988/1932) by John G. Neihardt.

[][][][]


descriptions:

Throughout U.S. history,
Native American peoples have been victim of virtually unrelenting efforts to force them (literally, by any means necessary)

Despite these unrelenting efforts, Native American resistance continues.
As elsewhere in the lands of the peoples of the Eagle and Condor, Native American tribes and nations in areas claimed by the U.S. government are continuing to resisit the detribalizing forces of modernity.
Moreover,
many Native American tribes and nations and religions in areas claimed by the U.S. and elsewhere are experiencing significant new growth. Vine Deloria, Jr. and other Native Americans often speak in terms of tribal renaissance and religious revival.
To be sure, some Native Americans are seeking to evangelize and convert non-tribal peoples to rightly tribal existence and to rightly tribal religions.

For examples:
Chief Oren Lyons of the Onondaga nation,
Vine Deloria of the Sioux nations,
Ed McGaa/Eagle Man of the Sioux nations,
and of course Black Elk of the Sioux nations,
are among increasing numbers of Native Americans seeking to share indigenous religious wisdom with modern hybrid and hyphenated-American peoples.

predictions:

For the short term,
in the U.S. and elsewhere in the lands of the peoples of the Eagle and Condor, modern hybrid and hyphenated-Americans will probably continue claiming political sovereignity over Native American peoples, tribes, nations, and land; and
they will probably continue claiming religious superiority; and
they will probably continue with efforts to convert Native American peoples to modern non-tribal versions of Christianity.

In short, modernity will probably continue into the near future.

And, Native American resistance will continue.

visons / alternative predictions:

In the long run,
according to many Native American predictions, visions, and prophecies,
indigenous tribal existence and indigenous tribal religions will survive and outlive the detribalizing forces of modernity.

For example, Vine Deloria of the Sioux nations predicts: "... we will survive ... And from our greater strength we shall wear down the white man and finally outlast him" (CUSTER, p. 224).

[See CUSTER DIED FOR YOUR SINS: AN INDIAN MANIFESTO (Norman Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 1989/1969) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]

.

[][][][]
sign of a more favorable future:


For many Native Americans, the 1994 birth of a white buffalo calf is a sign that the future will be very different from a simple continuation of the present.


See the following:

[Return to start of section 7.]

[][][][]

.
.

prescriptions:

Black Elk of the Sioux nation prescribes that the Lakota-Dakota-Nakota nations "go back into the sacred hoop and find the good red road" (BES, p. 274).
Black Elk's visions prescribe a return to the more rightly tribal religions of the Lakota-Dakota-Nakota past. But for Black Elk, this is not simply a return to the past. Black Elk acknowledges that it is no longer possible for his people to return to an economic dependence upon the bison herds. Instead, Black Elk prescribes that the people must "find another strength" (BES, p. 39).

finding another strength

Vine Deloria, Jr., also of the Sioux nations, offers even more specific prescriptions for Native American survival and flourishing in the contemporary and future world.
In addition to prescribing a revival of indigenous religions and tribal existence, Deloria prescribes the development of new tribes and new forms of tribalism.

During the 1970's Deloria prescribed and predicted that Native Americans should and would employ modern transportation and emerging electronic communications technologies to develop new tribal, intra-tribal, inter-tribal and international networks. And Deloria prescribed a new cooporate structured tribalism which seeks to share its profits with the people (CUSTER, pp. 263-265).

[See CUSTER DIED FOR YOUR SINS: AN INDIAN MANIFESTO (Norman Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 1989/1969) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]
[See GOD IS RED (New York: Grosset & Dunlap, 1973) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]
[See GOD IS RED: A NATIVE VIEW OF RELIGION, SECOND EDITION (Golden, Colorado: North American Press, 1992) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]
[See THE METAPHYSICS OF MODERN EXISTENCE (New York: Harper & Row, 1979) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]

In addition to prescribing a revival of traditional tribal existence and the creation of new forms of tribalism ("retribalize" and "recustomize"), Deloria also prescribed that Native Americans seek to "recolonize" unseattled territories while otherwise pursuing expanded territorial sovereignty (CUSTER, p. 265).

[See CUSTER DIED FOR YOUR SINS: AN INDIAN MANIFESTO (Norman Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 1989/1969) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]
[See WE TALK, YOU LISTEN: NEW TRIBES, NEW TURF (New York: Macmillan, 1970) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]
[Also, see THE NATIONS WITHIN: THE PAST AND FUTURE OF AMERICAN INDIAN SOVEREIGNTY (New York: Pantheon Books, 1984) by Vine Deloria, Jr. and Clifford M. Lytle; and see "Sacred Lands and Religious Freedom" in AMERICAN INDIAN RELIGIONS (Vol. 1: Issue 1, Winter 1994) by Vine Deloria, Jr.]

Furthermore,
in accordance with prescriptions and predictions by Deloria and others regarding Native American use of new technologies to advance tribal existence,
Native Americans are now prescribing and actually developing new tribal applications for modern technologies.

On the internet and world wide web,
there are now many bulletin boards, news groups, chat rooms, hyper-linked web sites, and other kinds of nets and networks prepared by and for Native Americans.

For example,
the Navaho concept of "atiin" ("atiin" is a Navajo word for roadway or pathway) is said to "symbolize the information superhighway" and "the desire to integrate culture and technology." And this concept is now being expressed in world wide web presentations prepared by a Native American corporation named for this concept--Advanced Tribal Integrated Information Networks or "ATIIN."

One example of another kind of Native American network,
a network taking advantage of radio technology,
is the amateur/ham radio morse code net called "Little Big Horn" or "LBH."
LBH meets at
14.057 MHz on Sundays at 22:00 UTC, and
21.150 MHz on Sundays at 22:30 UTC
(Tnx & 73 to WA2DAC in Peru, NY de WB4MFI in Dallas, TX for QSL confirming net QNI of 11 February 1990 on 21.150 MHz).

In accordance with Black Elk's visions which prescribe finding a new strength,
in accordance with predictions and prescriptions by Deloria and others, and
in accordance with the Navaho concept of "atiin,"
Native American tribes and nations are employing new technologies in creative new ways that advance tribal existence and contribute to a revival of more rightly tribal religions.


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


:o: [to Title Page] :o: [to Main Menu] :o: [to Circle of Concerns Menu]
:o: [to Start of Chapter 4]
(chapter 4, section 8)

Religion
among Contemporary European-American Peoples
in Native American and U.S. Claimed Territories:
Descriptions & Prescriptions

Here, our circle of concern embraces contemporary European-American peoples in territories north of the Rio Grande River where Native American claims to the land overlap and conflict with U.S. claims.

descriptions:

Throughout U.S. history,
hybrid and hyphenated-American peoples (including most notably European and European-American peoples) have been claiming
political sovereignity over Native American lands and peoples, and
religious superiority to indigenous Native American religions.

In addition to claiming political sovereignty and religious superiority,
modern hyphenated-American peoples (including especially European-American peoples) have a political and evangelical-missionary history of seeking to obliterate indigenous tribal existence and indigenous tribal religions.

From Native American perspectives, this is a most unfortunate history.
As elsewhere in the lands of the peoples of the Eagle and the Condor,
this unfortunate legacy of modernity continues.

[See MISSIONARY CONQUEST: THE GOSPEL AND NATIVE AMERICAN CULTURAL GENOCIDE (Fortress Press: Minneapolis, MN, 1993) by George E. Tinker.]
[And see Vine Deloria's review of George E. Tinker's MISSIONARY CONQUEST in the JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF RELIGION, Winter 1995, Volume LXIII, Number Four.]

prescriptions:

Native American social wisdom prescribes repentance to modern hybrid and hyphenated-American peoples in areas claimed by Native American and U.S. nations.

"Indigenous Peoples, a New Partnership"

"Indigenous Peoples, a New Partnership" is the official theme of Chief Oren Lyons's December 1992 address to the United Nations General Assembly concerning "The International Year of the Indigenous Peoples" (1993).

In this address, "Faithkeeper" and Chief Oren Lyons of the Onondaga Nation (one of the six nations of the Haudenausaunee confederation of nations, also called Iroquois Confederation of Nations or League of Six Nations) speaks to all peoples and all nations (UN General Assembly) on behalf of peoples and nations indigenous to Great Turtle Island.

Lyons offers religious instructions for a new true partnership.
These instructions are based upon the "Gai Eneshah Go'Nah" or "Great Law of Peace," "The Law of Life," "The Law of Regeneration," the "I hi do' hah" or "love for our Mother Earth."

"We were instructed to create societies based on the principles of Peace, Equity, Justice, and the Power of the Good Minds. Our societies are based upon great democratic principles of the authority of the people and equal responsibilities for the men and the women. This was a great way of life across the Great Turtle Island and freedom with respect was everywhere. Our leaders were instructed to be men of vision and to make every decision on behalf of the seventh generation to com; to have compassion and love for those generations yet unborn. We were instructed to give thanks for All That Sustains Us. Thus, we created ceremonies of Thanksgiving for the life-giving forces of the Natural World, as long as we carried out our ceremonies. life would continue. We were told that "The Seed is the Law." Indeed, it is the Law of Life. It is The Law of Regeneration. Within the seed is the mysterious force of life and creation. Our mothers nurture and guard that seed ... we love "I hi do' hah", our Mother Earth ... We were instructed to be generous and to share equally with our brothers and sisters so that all may be content. We were instructed to respect and love our Elders, to serve them ... love our children, indeed, to love ALL children." (Lyons in December 1992)

To all peoples and nations,
Lyons prescribes that this partnership should seek:
change in modern values,
and accordingly, the regeneration of human familes and of "the life that surrounds us." Lyons says, "We must join hands with the rest of Creation ..." (LYONS in 1992).

Also, Lyons prescribes a new model for righteous social ethical reflection: a Council of "Good Minds." Government by a council of good minds entails making decisions favoring the well-being of children and future generations, including "the seventh generation to come." To be sure, according to Chief Oren Lyons, contributing to the well-being of the seventh generation to come should have priority over other concerns.

[See "Oren Lyons The Faithkeeper with Bill Moyers," a Public Affairs Television interview of Chief Oren Lyons by Bill Moyers (Air Date: 3 July 1991, transcript #BMSP-16 by Journal Graphics, New York, 1991)]

To peoples and nations recently come to Great Turtle Island, including European-American peoples and the nations of Canda and the U.S.A.,
Lyons prescribes that this partnership should seek:
"self-determination, justice, freedom and peace" for indigenous peoples in their own traditional homelands and territories and "a renewal of what we enjoyed before the coming of our White Brothers from across the sea" (LYONS in 1992).

Furthermore, Chief Lyons brings forward the following "more specific issues":

[See a transcript of Oren Lyons's address to the United Nations' opening of "The Year of the Indigenous Peoples" (1993) on 10 December 1992 on the world wide web at http://kuhttp.cc.ukans.edu/~marc/orenlyon.html/
or,
see a web-downloaded-local-copy of Oren Lyons's address to the United Nations.]


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


:o: [to Title Page] :o: [to Main Menu] :o: [to Circle of Concerns Menu]
:o: [to Start of Chapter 4]
(chapter 4, section 9)

Religion
among Contemporary African-American Peoples
in Native American and U.S. Claimed Territories:

Here, our circle of concern embraces contemporary African-American peoples in territories north of the Rio Grande River where Native American claims to the land overlap and conflict with U.S. claims.

Like other modern peoples throughout the contemporary world,
African-Americans should re-learn a traditional tribal understanding of human existence:
  • Human existence is existence in relations to the Creator/Great Spirit.
  • Being rightly related to the Creator must include being rightly related to creation. And creation includes:
    • self and other individuals, peoples, tribes, and nations,
    • past-present-future life, including especially the seventh generation to come, and
    • other created-creative-creaturely life, including especially the land.

Tribalism, nationalism, relations to other life, including future life and land, are all within the circle of religious concerns.

.

The many examples of Native American religious ceremonies should remind African-Americans that traditional tribal religions include congregational dancing.

Dancing is a normal and righteous part of traditional tribal worship.

African-American religions need to recover religious dancing.

[Also, see "Let the People Dance" in EMPOWER THE PEOPLE: SOCIAL ETHICS FOR THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN CHURCH (Maryknoll, New York: Orbis Books, 1991) by Theodore Walker, Jr.]

.

[See Gangsta Rap, Hip Hop, Tupac, and Tribalism.]

.

.

.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


:o: [to Title Page ] :o: [to Main Menu] :o: [to Circle of Concerns Menu]
:o: [to Start of Chapter 4]
(chapter 4, section 10)

Religion
among Contemporary Mestizo-American Peoples
in Native American and U.S. Claimed Territories:

Here, our circle of concern embraces contemporary Mestizo-American peoples in territories north of the Rio Grande River where Native American claims to the land overlap and conflict with U.S. claims.

[][][][]

See the following:

[][][][]

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


:o: [to Title Page] :o: [to Main Menu] :o: [to Circle of Concerns Menu]
:o: [to Start of Chapter 4]
(chapter 4, section 11)

Religion
among Contemporary Asian-American Peoples
in Native American and U.S. Claimed Territories

Here, our circle of concern embraces contemporary Asian-American peoples in territories north of the Rio Grande River where Native American claims to the land overlap and conflict with U.S. claims.

.

"Kimochi"

According to the Kimochi Home Page
(at http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~ccambrid/kimochi.html on 28 December 1996):
"Kimochi, the organization, is a fusion of ideas and philosophies born of a joint American Indian and Asian American effort on the campus of the University of Colorado, Boulder, in 1972. The name, Kimochi, is a Japanese word that reflects the meaning of "a feeling of good will.""

[][][][]

[][][][]

[][][][]

[][][][]

[Also, for a Korean Minjung theology, see THE WOUNDED HEART OF GOD: THE ASIAN CONCEPT OF HAN AND THE CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE OF SIN (Nashville, Tenn: Abingdon Press, 1993) by Andrew Sung Park.]

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


:o: [to Title Page] :o: [to Main Menu] :o: [to Circle of Concerns Menu]
:o: [to Start of Chapter 4]
(chapter 4, section 12)

Religion
among Other Contemporary Hyphenated-American Peoples
in Native American and U.S. Claimed Territories:

Here, our circle of concern embraces other contemporary hyphenated-American peoples in territories north of the Rio Grande River where Native American claims to the land overlap and conflict with U.S. claims.

.

[][][][]

[][][][]

[][][][]

[][][][]

[][][][]

[][][][]

[][][][]

[][][][]

[][][][]

[][][][]

[][][][]

[][][][]


.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

The End of Chapter Four

.
.
.
.
original HTML formatting by Theodore Walker, Jr.,
amateur webmaster and Associate Professor of Ethics and Society,
Perkins School of Theology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75275.
e-mail address: twalker@mail.smu.edu
.
.

[ Return to chapter four's Circle of Concerns Menu to select another circle of concern.]
[ Flash Scroll Back to Start of chapter four: about Religion.]
[ Return to Main Menu (in the Introduction) to select another interpretive theme and chapter.]
[ Return to Title Page.]
.
.


most recent update: 4 November 1997

NOTICE OF COPYRIGHT: copyright 1997 Theodore Walker, Jr.

This copyright covers all content and formatting (browser-visible and HTML text) in this and attached documents created by Theodore Walker, Jr. c@Theodore Walker, Jr.
.