Caption	type	Docket No	Court Below	Petitioner's Counsel	Recent Filings	QP
Petitions and applications docketed on July 11, 2025
Jan Peters v. Malia M. Cohen, In Her Official Capacity as Chief Fiscal Officer, State Controller of California, and as Trustee of the Unclaimed Property Fund	paid	25-41	Ninth Circuit, No. 24-1040 Judgment: March 07, 2025	William Wayne Palmer	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the Controller’s actions under color of the California Unclaimed Property Law, Cal. Civ. Proc. Code §§ 1300, et seq. (“UPL”), violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because they deprive owners of their property without affording constitutionally adequate notice. Whether the Controller’s actions under color of the California UPL violate the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment because state employees and their commissioned private auditors seize, sell, and destroy private property without just compensation. 1
Douglas Manning v. Patrick Nogan, Administrator, East Jersey State Prison	ifp	25-5084	Third Circuit, No. 25-1180 Judgment: May 16, 2025	Douglas Manning	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented ‘qussTion PRESENTED \| 7 \| I. Plott F Claims thot Nefendartt’s ackion of Eoilure +. Ack amounted to Q dofrivation of Mt. Mannin (ight To reasonable Protection From assault as Ph ovded og the ExGhth Amendment to the Ws. Constitution. Lt. Whether the Plainist E's factual alle. ation OF an unl oyoked Beating by Irison Stal De Part Wait Of Correction faised aMaterjal \sSue und es the Eighth Amendment.
Donald Perry v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections	ifp	25-5085	Supreme Court of Florida, No. SC2024-1553 Judgment: January 03, 2025	Donald Perry	[Appendix] [Petition]	Question(s) presented arn 135 L.Ed Ad yy 9S Fron PRESENTED \| ier D Ach senyroe, NE DR Se galenhy/ aac vlfich hk locenes, IF PReved Réel bess Corpus ReYeP Might ASS, Real Pefi toning Far Packers n Proced RAL bar OR aoneaht NOE 7 oe F Vahcrhek iM Peclec! avons Period BEUSWCS. ALY NS [jb CREB MC aris Warden), Refftiones V. Floyo! Reakns 549 US. 3935 793 S.Ct May 28 21S, DE jclecl, February 25, 20/3 Appeals For the Sixth CzrcuzT Pork ins VMS Qurgs/as, ee ZS, 201A US. Apps LEXI ue (o cre. M he eA : (yn 76 F. 5 Ackles Ww eared, ). QuesTon (3) PRESENTED” WHETHER OR NI "VAG PREME Coury OF F/8Z0A, D625, O/Yb/al PETETEON CRS ay ICT NS Clases Ou JOMURY Se Od One bon of ve Unit OF DALERS 1553, Lowes Thvb ey Wee ty; POW oh © CASE Md, SCROYH- Q. cUHeTHek OR MOT CaN THE St Yokeue 0197 Oda Cee: EX. A ), sal LACKS oF Txy31 Coury OR LOLUER TRI b ORZO4, CA Paced anally BERR 1 —TarsdictinlClamed 93 Proceed 1 aseeeed M1970 CF COATT ANXX~ 553 on Teuaky 3,005 ? Bee nll ohh No.ISCAOAY- > OF Flonzpd, Cant PR urAily BasRed, Murkde . we CTE! ToS Meno} An) TBS Agen chy ST THE Tbe OF HES pearl ON BL PE 8 1977 2 bet are pages gpenies THe Palviouke hAsFiled NERY S Dogg fh" OF HAbGaS CORPUS « (See STacHed EXhib if A OD FR en Y. WHerHer or NoT CaN THE SUPREME CourT OF FlorZ0A , Can) p cl 4 ’ 1G ) AT; lea! Kew Drsesvere EV/ANLES ST TH 92 ie aay Barred, Hearings BY A pefebsd Lie] PETSTEDURS hes has L7H (IS) baa “ Seuonl GPS Couky Tesla an Ve VHT VISE es / WlSand YY. a Mean — Dip, Belle Joyce Kusyous, ZOE or DWe S Wee Rr seNoind ~ MAY / of d./9°77 To EYE Wits TH PeVsFiOsNCR— DOD A ehh Kil) WE RAS, SENT, AS THE SAME Vpe OF athy, 70 shay Teas aE TYPE OF MRERREL TE Stional}&S
Jimmy Jacoby Carr v. Iowa	ifp	25-5086	Court of Appeals of Iowa, No. 24-0667 Judgment: March 05, 2025	Jimmy Jacoby Carr	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented Was Counsel ineFectye © Kol Falling 40 Sever Felon in Should Conviction Stand becanse, OF question’ oF Yavin Pio
Tashawn Burns v. United States	ifp	25-5087	Second Circuit, No. 24-1265 Judgment: April 14, 2025	John Frederick Carman	[Petition]	Question(s) presented STATEMENT OF QUESTIONS PRESENTED \| 1. Is Hobbs Act robbery a “crime of violence” within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), a question left open after United States v. Taylor, 596 U.S. 845 (2022); see United States v. Stoney, 62 F.4th 108, 113 (83d Cir. 2023). \| ”
Lorenzo Elias Mendez v. United States	ifp	25-5088	Ninth Circuit, No. 24-4943 Judgment: January 27, 2025	Lorenzo Elias Mendez		NA
CashCall, Inc. v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau	app	25A46	Ninth Circuit, No. 23-55259 Judgment: —	Paul D. Clement	[Main Document] [Lower Court Orders/Opinions]	NA
Sandra A. Zikry, Individually, and as Parents and Natural Guardians of N. D., a Minor, et vir v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Association	app	25A47	Supreme Court of Florida, No. SC2025-0562 Judgment: —	Sandra A. Zikry	[Main Document]	NA
Dale H. Sundby v. Jeffrey Myers	app	25A48	Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, No. D084372 Judgment: —	Dale H. Sundby	[Main Document]	NA
Karyn M. Kelley, Individually and as Trustee of The Karyn M. Kelley Revocable Trust Agreement of July 13, 2016 v. Mary Feeney	app	25A49	Supreme Court of New Hampshire, No. 2024-0369 Judgment: —	Karyn M. Kelley	[Main Document] [Lower Court Orders/Opinions]	NA
Alfonso Chavez v. Alfonso Chavez Pacheco	app	25A50	Court of Appeals of Texas, Eighth District, No. 08-23-00072-CV Judgment: —	Alfonso E. Chávez Ayub	[Main Document]	NA
Donald Mortvedt v. Charles Clawson	app	25A51	Eighth Circuit, No. 25-1689 Judgment: —	Donald Mortvedt	[Main Document]	NA
Willie Roy Jenkins v. Texas	app	25A52	Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, No. WR-86,569-01, WR-86,569-02 Judgment: —	Benjamin Barrett Wolff	[Main Document] [Lower Court Orders/Opinions]	NA