type	Caption	Docket No	Court Below	Petitioner's Counsel	Counsel's Address	Recent Filings	QP
Petitions and applications docketed on April 24, 2026
paid	Henry L. Klein, the Succession of Frederick P. Heisler v. Lewis Title Insurance Company, Inc.	25-1214	Supreme Court of Louisiana, No. 2025-C-01544 Judgment: December 23, 2025	Henry Luis Klein	1410 First National Bank of Commerce Bldg. New Orleans, LA 70112	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented QUESTIONS PRESENTED Pursuant to Group Life & Health v. Royal Drug Company, 440 U.S. 405 (1979), are documents sold at real estate closings described as Owner’s Policies or Lender’s Policies “…contracts of insurance…” and is the title insurance industry engaged in “…the business of insurance…” protected by the McCarran-Ferguson Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1011-1015? Didthe Louisiana Supreme Court err as a matter of federal law in dismissing Petitioners’ writ application as untimely, not counting CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS DAY as a legal holiday notwithstanding 5 U.S.C. § 6103? Is a GVR final ruling superior to remand and mandamus on the fundamental issue of enforcing Group Life & Health v. Royal Drug Company, 440 U.S. 405 (1979) as the supreme law of the land pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2? 1
paid	Mark B. Cohen v. Judicial Conduct Board of Pennsylvania	25-1215	Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District, No. 63 EAP 2024 Judgment: January 21, 2026	Ilana Hope Eisenstein	DLA Piper LLP (US) 1650 Market Street Suite 5000 Philadelphia, PA 19103	[Petition]	NA
paid	Los Angeles Police Protective League v. City of Los Angeles, California	25-1216	Supreme Court of California, No. S275272 Judgment: November 10, 2025	Michael Alan Morguess	Rains Lucia Stern St. Phalle & Silver, PC 16130 Ventura Boulevard Suite 600 Encino, CA 91436	[Petition]	NA
paid	Andron Miguel Francis v. Allstate Insurance Company	25-1218	Court of Appeals of Georgia, No. A25D0341 Judgment: May 05, 2025	Andron Miguel Francis	2075 Salerno Drive Conyers, GA 30012	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented ee "ia 1 t I I
ifp	Curtis Van Stuyvesant v. New York	25-7249	Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, No. 2024-06912 Judgment: January 23, 2025	Curtis Van Stuyvesant	97-15 Horace Harding Expy. Apt. 15-H Corona, NY 11368		NA
ifp	Damian Jackson v. Patricia West	25-7250	Fourth Circuit, No. 25-6494 Judgment: November 25, 2025	Damian Jackson	#1134455 3521 Woods Way State Farm, VA 23160	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented CF _ QUESTION[S] PRESENTED a : , a \| QUESTION NUMBER 1 \| Be \| _ ‘Whether The U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VA,RICHMOND-DIVISI BO On,ERRORED, change SHALL to SHOULD in va code Ann§ 53.1-154. 7 SO — QUESTION NUMBER? 2 oS — Whether THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VA RICHMO: ’ \| ND-DIVISION errored in granting Defendants motion to dismiss and denying \| : JACKSON Fed.R.Civ.P.59 [e] to alter or amend .the. judgment. \| \| SO
ifp	Rahul Dev Manchanda v. Douglas Senderoff	25-7251	Second Circuit, No. 25-2359 Judgment: —	Rahul Dev Manchanda	270 Victory Boulevard New Rochelle, NY 10804	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether a court of appeals may dismiss a civil rights appeal sua sponte as “frivolous,” without briefing or adversarial testing, 1n conflict with Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 (1989). \| Whether sanctions threats and procedural hostility toward a civil rights litigant constitute retaliation that chills protected petitioning activity, in conflict with NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963). \| Whether a Court of Appeals may refuse to accept judicial misconduct complaints under 28 U.S.C. §§ 351-364, thereby nullifying Congress’s statutory oversight scheme and violating the First Amendment, the right of access to courts, and the separation of powers. Whether abstention doctrines—including Younger and the discretionary function exception—may be invoked sua sponte to bar constitutional claims without the procedural safeguards required by Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976). Whether indefinite withholding of rulings on pending motions constitutes denial of access to courts, contrary to Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977). Whether a court of appeals may impose a sanctions based filing bar not authorized by statute or rule, thereby creating a new jurisdictional barrier to appellate review. Whether the cumulative pattern across multiple federal and state proceedings demonstrates systemic constitutional suppression warranting this Court’s intervention.
ifp	Viorel Pricop v. United States	25-7252	Ninth Circuit, No. 24-3733 Judgment: November 05, 2025	Hanni M. Fakhoury	Moeel Lah Fakhoury LLP 2006 Kala Bagai Way Suite 16 Berkeley, CA 94704	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Did the Ninth Circuit misconstrue this Court’s precedent on the difference between a “claim” and an “argument” when it ruled Mr. Pricop’s sentencing claim was waived on appeal? 1
ifp	Stephon Cepeda Marsh v. Virginia	25-7253	Supreme Court of Virginia, No. 250171 Judgment: September 17, 2025	Stephon Cepeda Marsh	#1496398 Dillwyn Correctional Center 1522 Prison Road Dillwyn, VA 23936		NA
ifp	Susan Lloyd v. Lancaster County Housing Authority	25-7254	Third Circuit, No. 25-2457 Judgment: March 30, 2026	Susan Lloyd	55 Stanley Ave. Landisville, PA 17538		NA