type	Caption	Docket No	Court Below	Petitioner's Counsel	Counsel's Address	Recent Filings	QP
Petitions and applications docketed on April 28, 2026
paid	Kevin Isaac Montoya Palacios v. Jeremy R. Bacon, Field Office Director, Baltimore Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement	25-1223	Fourth Circuit, No. 26-6251 Judgment: March 24, 2026	William E. Evans	Goodwin Procter LLP 100 Northern Avenue Boston, MA 02210		NA
paid	Richard Rose v. Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State	25-1224	Eleventh Circuit, No. 25-11233 Judgment: November 25, 2025	Bryan Ludington Sells	The Law Office of Bryan L. Sells LLC Post Office Box 5493 Atlanta, GA 31107-0493	[Main Document] [Lower Court Orders/Opinions] [Written Request] [Petition]	NA
paid	Salissou Karim-Seidou v. CMA CGM (America) LLC	25-1225	Third Circuit, No. 25-1005 Judgment: September 04, 2025	Salissou Karim-Seidou	516 Sedgewick Avenue Stratford, CT 06615	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented QUESTIONS PRESENTED , 1. Whether, when denying a Litigant leave to amend a complaint a district court must provide a reason for that denial as held by the third, Seven, Ninth, Eleventh and D.C. Circuits or whether a \| district court need not provide justifying reasons when denying a pro se Litigant leave to amend the } complaint if that reason is apparent from an analysis of the record (as held by the First, Fourth, and Tenth : . Circuits) Is this a violation of due process? 2. Whether the Lower Court abused its discretion when departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings by dismissing the complaint “with prejudice” denying leave to amend under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) where the deficiencies were curable and no prejudice to the opposing party was shown? Rule 15(a)(2) “Leave shall be freely given”? 3. Whether the Third Circuit “overlooked or departed” from its own accepted and usual Judicial proceedings Rules by affirming the district court \| denial. Whether a complaint is subject to dismissal under Rule 12 where the dismissal order fails to allow plaintiffs, (Pro Se) any chance to amend the dismissed claims to conform to pleading standards? \|
ifp	Jason Starr v. United States	25-7261	Eleventh Circuit, No. 24-10131, 25-11499 Judgment: November 19, 2025	Mackenzie S Lund	Federal Defenders- Middle District of Alabama 817 South Court Street Montgomery, AL 36104	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented QUESTION PRESENTED I. In the opinion below, a panel of the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the exclusion of defense evidence related to an alternate perpetrator based upon its reading of Holmes v. South Carolina, 547 U.S. 319 (2006), and the fact that the defense was unable to specifically identify every accomplice involved in the conspiracy to commit a murder for hire. Can this conclusion be reconciled with this Court’s precedent in Holmes, 546 U.S. 319? II. Does the Eleventh Circuit’s interpretation of Holmes unconstitutionally alter the burden of proof between the defense and the government in cases involving evidence of third-party guilt? ll
ifp	Samuel Kwushue v. United States	25-7262	Eleventh Circuit, No. 24-12688 Judgment: November 25, 2025	Samuel Kwushue	6001 Kahiti Trace Union City, GA 30291	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : 1) Whether the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals improperly affirmed, on procedural ground of “another bite at the same apple”, to foreclose review of a : . y district court order denying Coram nobis relief, when petitioner’s claim of a Jurisdictional error, premised on a defective indictment; was not resolved, or not adequately addressed in a 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or correct the \| : sentence. \| } \| 2) Whether a grand jury indictment which alleged non-compliance with SNAP rules and regulations..... “All in violation of wire fraud statute 18 USCS \| 1348” is defective, is a Jurisdictional error of a most fundamental character that should warrant the issue of Coram nobis relief, to achieve justice »
ifp	Frank E. Polo, Sr. v. Scott Bernstein	25-7263	Eleventh Circuit, No. 25-10016 Judgment: October 01, 2025	Frank Polo Sr.	1475 SW 8th St Apt 411 Miami, FL 33135		NA
ifp	Levi Jonathan v. Florida	25-7264	District Court of Appeals of Florida, Sixth District, No. 6D2025-1353 Judgment: September 08, 2025	Levi Jonathan	#24-15744 Polk South County Jail 2390 Bob Phillips Road Bartow, FL 33830	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented es i a - r ry + SS i si ny saa re ar a PS Pr A rr erie rer Santee vere hy Sh Sr Sr sh ame ame tn eben dateenertheeeehe amecaene neta me arieinened . 7 ‘ ¢ = m = = = = - . ‘ ' . . eee ‘ 1 . ¢ ' . ! e oe mane tant aioe - * = i > - - " iatateattiate iad —w " aren wee ao re - wy ad oe - ¥ - - — _— . . U : t, . ‘ LL Se SS i i Php apy Piva fh y= ~ uy rn ppp fet ry = ry Ph Sal rt fier arpa apy pre =p Prey penal = - - ar a a PN nari ~ yn a CS AT IG GY Pp SCT TLE FON I TN AL I NA ON SE I, EO OE EAD LOL LLP NG EOE PEND EC LE CT TE EO TO EE I I ET I fT - - - A tl Stet et Yc AO Ye A FON a SP PP a Pe Ae a I A, SP a SP PS SSS SS SS SPSS Pa — ye “fF a pp ayi s, Ce ' ' i ‘ 1 peer safiiete meen ots - - - _ . . \| _ SS pS yh gi thems shir iam setting tire “un -arSP S -P PPA - - A rt pn eile ple rE Retentis 2 Pr. \| , . , . G . A A i ify paps ttt rr errr ere itr PF F-Pt S-Plus ene. ly eee inept enim dryly ph wtp npc a ip OT ee eel re ph nf shy ess hes ye S/n are irre t-rere rty n 7 . 4a * SSS SSS P-Series “prfespfys Pf - P r —P hLR Bhehiee raya yer rir rarerene herr Peary “YF fr - Pe ihiinedeenemnamhicnahamantadendeietedieteneat . ‘ . * get L 7 ’ ‘ 7 y . . - 4 al . 2 e 4 4 . SS SP SSS SPSS SSS SS SSS SSS SS Sho nrg ppp ph sn fi nape - - al vt : , % 1 ar, . 9 2 fe ; § the ne ‘ ? ‘ roy 5 « - , . : "1 et ' . ate 4 t 1 . , . * H “ . + ‘ Tt t+ ohh ; . ‘ . - . . ' hd . . . ~ ae é a . Fy yea We temer ote teet mee Te eeoer Datel '-« fe ~ = 3 « ‘ ; ay - * a ‘ een “4 i . » Me 3: ‘ r - 4 . 7 . . A Qs W j = — Ss 5 _ — ee — 7 _ * _ _ _ _ __ - - = f —_ .
ifp	Katie Young v. United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi	25-7266	Fifth Circuit, No. 25-60651 Judgment: March 09, 2026	Katie Young	754 Scenic Drive Grenada, MS 38901		NA
ifp	Antoine Johnson v. United States	25-7267	Ninth Circuit, No. 19-55717 Judgment: June 03, 2025	Jay Lawrence Lichtman	137 N. Larchmont Blvd., #538 Los Angeles, CA 90004	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented QUESTIONS PRESENTED \| 1. Under a categorical approach, does the least culpable conduct needed to prove a co-conspirator’s liability for a principal’s substantive violent crime pursuant to Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640 (1946) necessarily satisfy the requisite “crime of violence” predicate of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) following this Court’s decision in United States v. Taylor, 596 U.S. 845 (2022)? Must the “use of physical force” required to establish a predicate “crime of violence” under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A) be personal to the defendant convicted of using a firearm during that crime of violence under § 924(c), following this Court’s decision in Borden v. United States, 593 U.S. 420 (2021)? i
ifp	Brittney Felder v. MGM National Harbor, LLC	25-7269	Fourth Circuit, No. 25-1694 Judgment: January 09, 2026	Brittney Felder	6902 Forbes Boulevard Seabrook, MD 20706	[Main Document]	NA
ifp	Angelo Galloway v. United States	25-7270	Fourth Circuit, No. 25-6515 Judgment: October 21, 2025	Angelo Galloway	541 Madison Avenue Cape Charles, VA 23310		NA
ifp	Benjamin M. Murphy, Sr. v. Iowa Department of Health and Human Services	25-7271	Eighth Circuit, No. 25-2072 Judgment: August 27, 2025	Benjamin M. Murphy Sr.	1438 Asbury Ln. Waterloo, IA 50701		NA