This case arises from Federal Communications Commission forfeiture orders just like the ones in FCC v. AT&T, Inc., 608 U.S. __ (2026). The decision below addressed the same questions at issue in AT&T, but without the benefit of this Court’s decision in AT&T or the government’s significant legal conces- sions about the limited force of FCC orders and the proper scope of enforcement proceedings.

This petition also presents two important statu- tory questions. The Communications Act of 1934 re- quires providers of telecommunications service—i.e., voice service—to protect the confidentiality of “cus- tomer proprietary network information” (CPNI), de- fined in relevant part as information that both (i) re- lates to the “destination, location, and amount of use of a telecommunications service,” and (ii) is made available to the telecommunications carrier “solely by virtue of the carrier-customer relationship.” 47 U.S.C. § 222(h)(1) (emphasis added). The Act also caps the total penalties that the FCC may assess “for any con- tinuing violation” involving a single act or failure to act. Id. § 503(b)(2)(B). The questions presented are:

1. Whether this Court should, at minimum, grant, vacate, and remand in light of AT&T and the govern- ment’s concessions in that case.

2. Whether “location” CPNI under § 222 refers only to call-location information, not other infor- mation about the location of a mobile device.

3. Whether the number of “continuing violations” arising from a single failure to act under § 503(b) is a legal question for courts to decide, without deferring to the FCC’s conclusion.

1. Will the United States Supreme Court invalidate the

California Tort Claims Act? , 2. Will the United States Supreme Court order Donald J.

Trump to pay The People classified as “aliens” and

“immigrants” Who were and are deported, detained,

arrested and imprisoned $900 million each, for each month

that The People were deported, detained, arrested and

imprisoned respectively? | 3. Will the United States Supreme Court order the United

States of America to pay The People classified as “aliens”

| Who were and are deported, detained, arrested and

imprisoned $900 million each, for each month that The

People were deported, detained, arrested and imprisoned

respectively? by “respectively” in numbers 2 and 3 I mean

each individual time and person, and not a $900 million

collectively spread across The People classified as |

“aliens”? 4. Does the United States Supreme Court interpret The People |

classified as “aliens” and “immigrants” as citizens to make |

The People’s interpretation accurate? 5. Does the United States Supreme Court order the United

States government and President Donald J. Trump to stop

2