Petitions and applications docketed on July 17, 2026
type Caption Docket No Court Below Petitioner's Counsel Counsel's Address Recent Filings QP
paid Rene Adalberto Acosta-Tapia

v.

Todd Blanche, Acting Attorney General

26-79 Ninth Circuit, No. 25-2460

Judgment: January 15, 2025

Siovhan Sheridan Ayala Ayala Law Office, PC PO Box 18986 Tucson, AZ 85731 NA
paid Felicia Scroggins

v.

City of Shreveport, Louisiana

26-80 Fifth Circuit, No. 24-30777

Judgment: October 17, 2025

Felicia Scroggins 9314 Sandalwood Drive Shreveport, LA 71118 [Petition] [Appendix]
Question(s) presentedi | | QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Fifth Circuit erred in affirming | | summary judgment where the record contains genu- - ine disputes of material fact, in conflict with this Court’s precedent requiring that evidence be viewed in the ight most favorable to the nonmoving party. 2. Whether the Fifth Circuit misapplied the bur- | den-shifting framework under McDonnell Douglas | Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), by effectively re- | quiring Petitioner to disprove the employer’s stated ‘reasons rather than allowing a jury to determine pre- text. : 3. Whether the Fifth Circuit improperly applied | forfeiture principles to a pro se litigant in a manner inconsistent with this-Court’s directive that pro se fil- | | ings be liberally construed.
paid Dennis G. Deppe

v.

Sandra M. Sovinski

26-81 Eleventh Circuit, No. 25-10646

Judgment: December 19, 2025

Dennis G. Deppe 5749 Aloma Woods Blvd. Oviedo, FL 32765 NA
paid Dennis D. Sadorra

v.

Starlight Dunes HOA

26-82 Ninth Circuit, No. 24-1754

Judgment: May 27, 2025

Dennis D. Sadorra 43810 Skyward Way LaQuinta, CA 92253 NA
ifp Antjuan Pierre Jackson

v.

United States

26-5106 Sixth Circuit, No. 25-1187

Judgment: March 16, 2026

William Christopher Livingston Berkman Gordon Murray & DeVan 55 Public Sq. Ste 2200 Cleveland, OH 44113 [Petition] [Appendix]
Question(s) presentedQUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Under the totality-of-the-circumstances test, may probable cause to search a home rest on inference stacking—a series of inferences built on other inferences—when the affidavit lacks a concrete, corroborated nexus to the place to be searched, or does the Fourth Amendment impose limits requiring quality over quantity in the probable-cause calculus? 1
ifp Jorge Guevara-Martinez

v.

Alexandria Department of Community and Human Services

26-5107 Court of Appeals of Virginia, No. 184822

Judgment: September 02, 2025

James Chandler Martin Martin & Martin Law Firm 410 Patton St., Ste. A P.O. Box 514 Danville, VA 24543 [Petition] [Appendix]
Question(s) presentedQUESTION PRESENTED

This Court has ruled that the parent-child relationship is a fundamental liberty interest under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment; that until the State proves parental unfitness, child and parent share a vital interest in preventing erroneous termination of the natural relationship; and that this fundamental liberty interest pertains to citizens and aliens alike since Due Process applies to all persons within the United States, including aliens, whether their presence here is lawful, unlawful, temporary, or permanent. The question presented 1s:

Did terminating the parental rights of Guevara, an alien parent, violate his Due Process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, where no clear and convincing evidence showed he was an unfit parent, and delays caused by the mother’s abduction of the child and moving sald child illegally to the United States shortly before the onset of a pandemic, by Guevara’s refusal to enter the United States until he could do so legally, and by the time taken by appeals in this case were not culpable acts on his part and cannot be used to conclude that the child’s need for finality requires termination.

1

ifp Teodoro Chavez-Fernandez

v.

United States

26-5108 Fifth Circuit, No. 25-11036

Judgment: April 16, 2026

Maria Gabriela Vega Office of the Federal Public Defender, NDTX 525 S. Griffin St. Ste. 629 Dallas, TX 75202 [Petition] NA
ifp Elhadj A. M. Souare

v.

Elizabeth Tiltscher

26-5109 Court of Appeals of Ohio, Summit County, No. 31516

Judgment: February 11, 2026

Elhadj A. M. Souare PO Box 7024 Akron, OH 44306 NA
ifp Jamel A. Carlton, aka Jamal Carlton

v.

New Jersey

26-5110 Supreme Court of New Jersey, No. 090241

Judgment: February 23, 2026

Jamel Carlton #000830352G NJSP 600 Cass Street Trenton, NJ 08625 NA
ifp Richard Edward Boggs

v.

United States

26-5111 Fourth Circuit, No. 25-6347

Judgment: February 24, 2026

Richard Edward Boggs 655H Fairview Rd. #246 Simpsonville, SC 29680 NA
ifp Michael A. Hagar

v.

Federal Bureau of Investigation

26-5112 Fifth Circuit, No. 25-40188

Judgment: March 26, 2026

Michael A. Hagar Oriana House, Inc. 1829 East 55th Street Cleveland, OH 44103 NA
app Official Committee of Talc Claimants

v.

Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Inc.

26A86 Third Circuit, No. 24-2201, 24-2211, 25-1044

Judgment: —

Elizabeth Barchas Prelogar Cooley LLP 1299 Pennsylvania Ave Washington, DC 20004 [Main Document] NA
app Luis Moreno-Godoy

v.

United States

26A87 Second Circuit, No. 25-2462

Judgment: —

Luis Felipe Moreno-Godoy #60461-054 FCI Oakdale I P.O. Box 5000 Oakdale, LA 71463 [Main Document] NA
app Anthony Lee Daniels

v.

United States

26A88 Fourth Circuit, No. 24-4080

Judgment: —

Jaclyn L. Tarlton Assistant Federal Public Defender Eastern District of North Carolina 150 Fayetteville St., Suite 450 Raleigh, NC 27601 [Main Document] [Lower Court Orders/Opinions] NA
app Michael J. Madigan

v.

United States

26A89 Seventh Circuit, No. 25-2249

Judgment: —

Lisa S. Blatt Williams & Connolly LLP 680 Maine Avenue SW Washington, DC 20024 [Main Document] [Lower Court Orders/Opinions] NA
app Mahmoud Khalil

v.

Donald J. Trump, President of the United States

26A90 Third Circuit, No. 25-2162, 25-2357

Judgment: —

Brett Max Kaufman American Civil Liberties Union Foundation 125 Broad Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10004 [Main Document] [Lower Court Orders/Opinions] [Main Document] NA