type	Caption	Docket No	Court Below	Petitioner's Counsel	Counsel's Address	Recent Filings	QP
Petitions and applications docketed on September 17, 2026
paid	Joaquin Herrera Avila v. Todd Blanche, Attorney General	26-354	Eighth Circuit, No. 25-3248 Judgment: March 25, 2026	David Lee Wilson	Wilson Law Group 3019 Minnehaha Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55406		NA
paid	New Mexico Trappers Association v. Raúl Torrez	26-361	Tenth Circuit, No. 25-2117 Judgment: June 08, 2026	Gary Russell Leistico	Leistico & Esch, PLLC P.O. Box 365 Clear Lake, MN 55319	[Petition]	NA
paid	Fortress Iron, LP v. Digger Specialties, Inc.	26-362	Federal Circuit, No. 2024-2313 Judgment: April 02, 2026	Paul V. Storm	Foley & Lardner LLP 2021 McKinney Avenue Suite 1600 Dallas, TX 75201	[Petition]	NA
paid	Joe Martin Bravo v. Dallas Independent School District	26-363	Fifth Circuit, No. 25-10982 Judgment: June 01, 2026	Peter F. Bagley	Law Office of Peter Bagley PLLC 2304 West Interstate 20 Ste. 240 Arlington, TX 76017	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented QUESTION PRESENTED The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that Petitioner Joe Martin Bravo failed to identify a legally sufficient comparator and, because his Title VII claim failed that “threshold inquiry,” declined to reach his remaining arguments.! The federal circuit courts employ materially different methodologies for determining whether comparator insufficiency prevents other circumstantial evidence from receiving judicial consideration. The petition therefore asks whether failure to identify a legally sufficient comparator may become a threshold barrier to consideration of circumstantial evidence bearing on intentional discrimination. The question presented is whether Title VII and Rule 56 permit a court, after determining that a plaintiff lacks a legally sufficient comparator under a judicially developed prima facie framework, to terminate the summary judgment inquiry without considering other circumstantial evidence bearing on intentional discrimination. 1The Fifth Circuit's Opinion reads in relevant part, “Because Bravo's Title VII claim fails this threshold inquiry, we do not reach his other arguments.” Pet. App. 8, n.3. 1
paid	Gregg P. Healey v. U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust	26-364	Second Circuit, No. 26-54 Judgment: April 29, 2026	Gregg P. Healey	61 East Meadow Rd. Wilton, CT 06897		NA
paid	Gary Betts v. Boone County, Illinois	26-365	Seventh Circuit, No. 25-1685 Judgment: June 15, 2026	Roman Martinez V	Latham & Watkins, LLP 555 Eleventh Street, NW Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20004	[Petition]	NA
paid	In Re Bahig F. Bishay	26-366	NA, No. — Judgment: —	Bahig F. Bishay	P.O. Box 396 Norwood, MA 02062		NA
paid	Venky Venkatraman v. Bank of America, N.A.	26-367	Fifth Circuit, No. 25-10969 Judgment: April 14, 2026	Venky Venkatraman	Zenith Legal Services LLC 450 S Denton Tap Road #1503 Coppell, TX 75019	[Appendix] [Petition]	NA
paid	Carolynn Elizabeth Wood v. David Lynn Haynes	26-368	Supreme Court of Alabama, No. SC-2025-0205 Judgment: May 22, 2026	Carolynn E. Woods	491 White Plains Rd. Anniston, AL 36207		NA
paid	John Torsten Loop v. Washington	26-369	Ninth Circuit, No. 24-5020 Judgment: March 20, 2026	John Torsten Loop	734 10th Avenue E Seattle, WA 98102		NA
paid	The Nielsen Company (US), LLC v. Cumulus Media New Holdings Inc.	26-370	Second Circuit, No. 26-88 Judgment: July 13, 2026	Thomas Henderson Dupree Jr.	Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP 1700 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20036-4504	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented QUESTION PRESENTED The Nielsen Company (US), LLC offered its radio- ratings products to Cumulus Media New Holdings Inc. both bundled at a discount and on a standalone basis, at prices no one contends were below cost. The Second Circuit nonetheless held that the standalone offer was likely an unlawful “constructive tie” under Section 2 of the Sherman Act because the price was so “exorbitant” that Cumulus had “no choice” but to take the bundle. The court then affirmed a preliminary in- junction barring Nielsen from charging a “commer- cially unreasonable rate.” The question presented is: Whether a seller who offers its products separately and in a bundle, at prices never alleged to be below cost, may be held liable under Section 2 of the Sher- man Act for a “constructive tie” because a court deems a standalone price too high relative to a discounted bundle.
paid	Karnail Singh v. United States	26-371	Sixth Circuit, No. 25-1523 Judgment: May 05, 2026	Lisa S. Blatt	Williams & Connolly LLP 680 Maine Avenue SW Washington, DC 20024	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Sixth Amendment requires attorneys to inform clients who are naturalized citizens that pleading guilty carries a risk of denaturalization. (I)
ifp	Edwin Giovanni Salinas v. United States	26-5591	Eighth Circuit, No. 25-2916 Judgment: May 07, 2026	Edwin Giovanni Salinas	#43923-510 FCC Coleman Medium PO Box 1032 Coleman, FL 33521-1032		NA
ifp	Randy Lavern Lee v. Beth Skinner, Director, Iowa Department of Corrections	26-5592	Eighth Circuit, No. 26-1468 Judgment: May 20, 2026	Randy Lavern Lee	#6366232 Newton Correctional Facility 307 S. 60th Avenue W., PO Box 218 Newton, IA 50208		NA
ifp	Steven Clark Lefemine v. United States	26-5593	Fourth Circuit, No. 24-4419 Judgment: May 01, 2026	Steven Clark Lefemine	PO Box 12222 Columbia, SC 29211	[Main Document]	NA
ifp	James Stuart Faller, II v. United States	26-5594	Sixth Circuit, No. 24-6079 Judgment: May 04, 2026	James Stuart Faller II	PO Box 121 Edgefield, SC 29824		NA
ifp	William Wayne Stedman v. Texas	26-5595	Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, No. WR-96,638-03 Judgment: January 29, 2026	William Wayne Stedman	#02499056 Wallace Unit 1675 S. FM 3525 Colorado City, TX 79512	[Main Document]	NA
ifp	Penny Alexandra Jackson v. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center School of Medicine	26-5596	Fifth Circuit, No. 25-10942 Judgment: April 29, 2026	Penny Alexandra Jackson	7501 N. Sheridan Road Chicago, IL 60626		NA
ifp	Roman Serpik v. Oklahoma	26-5597	Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, No. PC-2026-414 Judgment: August 14, 2026	Roman Serpik	105 Janets Way Suite C-228 Elk City, OK 73644		NA
ifp	Yannick Bopda v. State of Maryland Central Collection	26-5598	Circuit Court of Maryland, Prince George’s County, No. C-16-CV-25-003608 Judgment: November 06, 2025	Yannick Bopda	11600 Nebel St. Rockville, MD 20852		NA
ifp	Frank Romero v. Corey Fhuere, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary	26-5599	Ninth Circuit, No. 24-6328 Judgment: March 11, 2025	Frank Romero	#10024348 Oregon State Penitentiary 2605 State Street Salem, OR 97310		NA
ifp	Sedric Thomas v. Florida	26-5600	District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District, No. 1D2023-3208 Judgment: April 10, 2026	William Mallory Kent	Kent & McFarland 1919 Atlantic Blvd Jacksonville, FL 32207	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented QUESTION PRESENTED WHETHER THOMAS’S SENTENCE MUST BE VACATED BECAUSE THE COURT RELIED UPON UNCHARGED CONDUCT TO DETERMINE THE SENTENCE IMPOSED AND IN SO DOING VIOLATED THOMAS’S RIGHT TO DUE PROCESS OF LAW. 1
ifp	Dennis Scott Florer v. Ford Motor Company	26-5601	Ninth Circuit, No. 24-2591 Judgment: January 23, 2026	Scott Florer	368 W. Idaho St. #2 Blackfoot, ID 83221		NA
ifp	Lionel Tate, Sr. v. L. Chavez	26-5602	Ninth Circuit, No. 24-5349 Judgment: February 24, 2026	Lionel Tate Sr.	#C-88165 P.O. Box 950 Folsom, CA 95763		NA
ifp	Bryan Okeeif Thomas v. United States	26-5603	Fifth Circuit, No. 25-11109 Judgment: July 14, 2026	Bryan Thomas	18757-510 FMC Fort Worth P.O. Box 15330 Fort Worth, TX 76119		NA
ifp	Jose Leonel Beltran-Nino v. United States	26-5604	Fifth Circuit, No. 25-50672 Judgment: June 30, 2026	Kristin L. Davidson	Federal Public Defender 300 Convent Street Suite 2300 San Antonio, TX 78205	[Petition] [Appendix]	Question(s) presented i QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Should the Court overrule Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998)?
app	Stephen Downs v. Doug Collins, Secretary of Veterans Affairs	26A363	Sixth Circuit, No. 25-5115 Judgment: —	Stephen A. Downs	256 Madison Blvd Madison, TN 37115	[Main Document]	NA
app	Crosspoint Church v. A. Pender Makin, Commissioner, Maine Department of Education	26A365	First Circuit, No. 24-1590 Judgment: —	Patrick Strawbridge	Consovoy McCarthy PLLC 265 Franklin Street Suite 1702 PMB A189 Boston, MA 02110	[Main Document] [Lower Court Orders/Opinions]	NA
app	John Edward Kuplen v. North Carolina	26A366	Supreme Court of North Carolina, No. 459P13-2 Judgment: —	John Edward Kuplen	#0230328 Hyde Correctional Institution PO Box 278 Swan Quarter, NC 27885	[Main Document] [Lower Court Orders/Opinions]	NA
app	Charles Roy v. United States	26A367	Fifth Circuit, No. 25-30285 Judgment: —	Samantha Jean Kuhn	Federal Public Defender’s Office 500 Poydras Street, Suite 318 New Orleans, LA 70130	[Main Document] [Lower Court Orders/Opinions]	NA
app	St. Dominic Academy, dba Roman Catholic Bishop of Portland, a Corporation Sole v. A. Pender Makin, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Department of Education	26A368	First Circuit, No. 24-1739 Judgment: —	Mark Leonard Rienzi	The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty 1919 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006	[Main Document]	NA
app	Tom Gann v. Oklahoma Corporation Commission ex rel. Oklahoma	26A369	Supreme Court of Oklahoma, No. 122,861 Judgment: —	Tom Gann	Oklahoma State House of Representatives 2300 N. Lincoln Blvd. Room 334 Oklahoma City, OK 73105	[Main Document] [Lower Court Orders/Opinions]	NA